Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Is All Around (EP)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No quorum - NPASR. —Darkwind (talk) 06:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Love Is All Around (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am nominating a group of eps by the one artist. They lack coverage in independent reliable sources. Lack reviews, charting, awards. Nothing coming close to WP:NALBUMS. Just a bunch on bad external links trying to publicise the album. The only references are the artist own site, soundcloud, bandcamp, a shop. None independent reliable sources. The external links are just linkspam. Others nominated are:
- Touch (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Interludes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Who Do You Trust? (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
duffbeerforme (talk) 08:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply] - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- included on 3 September. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Given that the artist is clearly notable, I have to wonder whether deleting all these related articles is the best approach. If we have a glut of articles on the releases without much more content than basic details and tracklisting, bringing them all together in a fairly detailed discography would probably be the best approach. --Michig (talk) 09:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
