Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Possibly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Love Possibly

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo about incredibly obscure film written by a writer-director-producer of the film. Orange Mike | Talk 23:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:NFILM says, inter-alia, If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, ... well for the number of awards this film has received there is a marked paucity of coverage of these awards, leading to a remarkable paucity of references and WP:TOOSOON for this film. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:51, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't really find anything about this film, despite the multitude of awards, at least some of which seem to be vanity awards given by outlets that award a large amount of films several times a year. None of the awards seems to be able to give even partial notability and that, paired with the dearth of coverage makes me see this movie as failing NFILM. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:57, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially it looks like the person in charge of sending out and/or promoting the film went on Film Freeway and selected everything they could. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFILM, didn't get enough significant coverage. INeedToFlyForever (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – there's just no coverage of the film in reliable sources that would enable us to back up anything we write about it. The award-coverage ratio is really strange, but I think it's best explained by, as ReaderofthePack suggests, the filmmakers submitting their film to every outlet on FilmFreeway or some similar such service in an effort to construct a Potemkin village of praise. Many of these non-notable festivals seem design to churn out the greatest number of awards in the shortest amount of time; Oneiros and the Monthly Film Festival, for example, award hundreds of obscure films films each month. We're here to summarize what reliable sources have to say about given subjects; if they don't say anything at all, it only befits us to do the same. —0xf₈e₈ 💿 (talk) 02:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - despite apparently being shown at more film festivals than one can shake a stick at, seems to have almost zero coverage Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.