Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lull (EP)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. v/r - TP 00:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Lull (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be notable. Lachlanusername (talk) 00:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Release from highly notable band that has received significant coverage.--Michig (talk) 06:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it's been reviewed by a number of notable publications. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:09, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Satisfies WP:NALBUMS: notable band, mainstream record label, two professional reviews, verifiable content. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
