Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mackenzie Ziegler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mackenzie Ziegler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 13:20, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Dance Moms. All reliable sources that mention Mackenzie do so in the context of Dance Moms, but she definitely doesn't have enough sourcing to support independent notability. Moswento ^talky 13:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as above, sounds like a good solution. Mabalu (talk) 11:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Comment On second thoughts, having just realised the subject is a child, and given the really strong arguments re: articles on questionably notable children on User:DGG's recent Eden Wood discussion, I question whether we should have this article at all. Mabalu (talk) 12:03, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it's not just questionably notable children, it's children whose borderline notability comes from being exploited by the entertainment industry in sexualized shows. We of course need an article about the show, and I can see including the childrens name in that article, But highlighting it with an article is a clear violation of child protection. DGG ( talk ) 18:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: I'd like to draw your attention to Maddie Ziegler, which is another article about a child from Dance Moms. Maybe it should be nominated for deletion as well. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 20:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.