Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind Over Maddie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mind Over Maddie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources outside of the show's premiere date and cast can be found, other than IMDb and youtube Finealt (talk) 15:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:06, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm running into some issues as well, but I do see where the show was nominated for an Astra Award last year. I'm still digging so I haven't made an official decision yet but there has to be more out there. If not, there should be an appropriate redirect target since most Disney channels have a list of programming out there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, I'm not sure that an Astra nomination is enough to drive notability, given the fishbowl-size of the Australian straight-to-cable TV production industry. That said, there is some independent coverage here, but not enough I think to satisfy the WP:GNG. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:05, 18 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. I found some viewership figures and a newspaper review, both are from realiable sources to establish notability. Keenan202 (talk) 15:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.