Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miranova Place

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miranova Place

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep given coverage in Dwell [1], plus articles like these [2] [3][4][5] --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 19:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The coverage indicated by Arxiloxos is very extensive and in-depth and plenty of evidence of notability. --Oakshade (talk) 19:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Certainly meets WP:GEOFEAT with in-depth coverage in national sources and specialized books.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 02:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn per above -thank you for your input. Boleyn (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.