Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miyu Greer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List_of_My-HiME_anime_characters. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 00:23, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Miyu Greer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see why this character is of encyclopedic importance. It's completely in-universe, has only primary sources, and seem entirely non-notable. We are not an anime fansite, at least we're not supposed to be. Drmies (talk) 04:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 04:49, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of My-HiME anime characters. I don't see where this character is independently notable of the series itself. A redirect is appropriate in this instance.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Merge~~ Redirect to List of My-HiME anime characters, ~~the info on the character page just has a brief mention of the character, more detailed info without going too far would be helpful~~ - Edit: I have gone ahead and made the merge. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:42, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - A character that has not received enough real world coverage. Also has no independent notability. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 10:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.