Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mkstemp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (WP:SKCRIT#1) (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 09:02, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mkstemp

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 13:20, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Are we covering POSIX API calls? Because if we are, this is clearly one of them, and notable. It's dull, but worthy. It's not at all exciting, but it is used enormously widely, and widely documented. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:37, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is well referenced to multiple reliable sources that cover the subject in good detail, so it passes the general notability guideline. --Joshua Issac (talk) 16:07, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination after great improvements show it can pass the GNG threshold. Boleyn (talk) 08:00, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.