Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morrison Hashii

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 04:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Morrison Hashii

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having played 2 minutes in Singapore, for a community college and in the English non-league, this player has not picked up significant, independent coverage to meet WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte (talk) 07:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I have expanded the article as much as currently possible, and with Hashii being a relatively prolific goal-scorer in non-league football in England, I imagine he will continue to garner coverage. Worst case, draftify. Zênite (talk) 17:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sourcing is limited to non-RS blog posts (e.g. nonleaguehq), routine transactional and award announcements in local news, and routine match recaps. Not seeing anything approaching GNG here. JoelleJay (talk) 02:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My !vote considered the sources used for expansion. JoelleJay (talk) 20:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, it would be helpful to get a review of expansion of this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:15, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with JoelleJay's assessment. Geschichte (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.