Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Michaels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Michaels

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO or WP:JOURNALIST. Just because she is related to someone notable, doesn't make her notable. LibStar (talk) 06:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, News media, and Australia. AllyD (talk) 07:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My searches indicate she is not notable. CT55555(talk) 14:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I can't find any reliable sources either. She has published a book but would not meet WP:AUTHOR. Fails to meet any notability criteria. Cabrils (talk) 23:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article has no noteworthy sources, notability not evident. WWGB (talk) 01:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.