Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Malis
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 08:20, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nick Malis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem notable. I found a few name-drops but nothing of substance. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable minor comedy writer. Google search did not turn anything promising. The Time article mentions him only tangentially. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 11:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 09:46, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per GNG and above. Sarah (talk) 17:19, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TheSpecialUserTalkContributions* 07:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Google not showing enough results which are notable. And per nom fails GNG. →TheSpecialUserTalkContributions* 07:55, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.