Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Kung Fu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No Kung Fu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM; no reliable journalism, no critical commentary, no chart positions, nothing. I consider myself an expert on the topic of Lana Del Rey, and I have contributed to and written extensive portions of every article related to her on Wikipedia. From the extensive research I've done on the singer, I have encountered mention of No Kung Fu, but the lack of reliable sources has led others (including myself) to believe it's an urban legend. Almost every single song on the alleged EP appears on her debut album Lana Del Ray a.k.a. Lizzy Grant. Thevampireashlee (talk) 02:20, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I'm unable to find coverage for this unreleased demo/EP/thing. Whether or not it exists, it appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. Gong show 08:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 23:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - After searching for sources, I don't think this really exists. If it does, it meets no notability guidelines whatsoever due to lack of coverage. T C N7JM 12:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.