Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Year Waiting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as A7 and salted by Jmlk1 (talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. --Dhartung | Talk 06:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One Year Waiting

Delete. This band does not meet the criteria of WP:MUSIC - no album releases on major labels, nothing on the charts. ... discospinster _talk 01:33, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per CSD A7. Nakon 01:33, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I feel a bit bad suggesting deletion as they seem like one of those enthusiastic garage bands, and I don't really like putting down such efforts. But for every high-quality, well-written article on non-notable people like this, we get a thousand promotional blurbs, and two thousand written by enthusiastic people who can't really write that will never be seen fit to be improved by anyone else ever. I don't think there's any policy to support its inclusion, and so... suppose we have to go with policy. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 01:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, as has been done four times already, three times today. The creator has been blocked for removing AfD tags. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 01:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A7 Absolutely no assertation of notability. I endorse the A7 tag already on the page. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:07, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn, per nom. Atyndall93 | talk 04:14, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.