Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oyster Protocol
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oyster Protocol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertisement for newly-established, minor, non-notable business. Entirely sourced to advert/tech blogs. No decent independent sources or in-depth third party WP:RS coverage that is even near to passing WP:NCORP or WP:GNG, just press releases and advertorial. See also WP:Articles for deletion/8base. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:42, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:42, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. essentially advertising. DGG ( talk ) 15:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - another article going around our G11/A7 CSD. --Quek157 (talk) 20:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: An article on a recent start-up, containing and supported by text describing the proposition. No evidence of attained notability whether by WP:CORPDEPTH for the company or WP:NSOFTWARE & WP:GNG for the product. AllyD (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.