Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padsha Wazir (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. hat notes are there on each of those pages JForget 01:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Padsha Wazir (disambiguation)

Nominate for deletion This article contains the primary page, Padsha Wazir, and only one other entry, which is transliterated differently. Whether they are transliterated the same or similar, this would still be an unnecessary dab as there is a hatnote on each directly to the other - this dab is therefore of no benefit. The reasons given for the prod removal were because I had not written my reasons for the prod well, so it was removed because it may have been based on the misconception that these two were unrelated names. This isn't the case - if they were transliterated the same on here, this would still have been nominated for deletion. Boleyn3 (talk) 08:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand, you want to delete a DISAMBIG page because there's already a "To see the..." template at the top of each page? Sherurcij ^{(speaker for the dead)} 04:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A valid disambiguation page should have at least three entries to disambiguate among. When there are only two, the preferred method is to have hatnotes on both articles pointing to the other. WP:DAB. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A valid dab with a primary topic should have at least three entries. A valid dab with no primary topic only needs two entries. It doesn't change the outcome of this AfD (there is a primary topic, Padsha Wazir). -- JHunterJ (talk) 10:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:48, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Hat note is more effective for this. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 01:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a hatnote on both articles works fine. Tavix | Talk 03:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix | Talk 03:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphan dab whose navigational function is served by hatnotes on the articles. -- JHunterJ (talk) 10:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.