Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Fok
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Patrick Fok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
TV person but no evidence offered as to his notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:18, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no third-party reliable sources in either English or Chinese. cab (call) 02:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- O 0N18 (talk · contribs)'s other contributions should probably also be brought to AfD as well, all he seems to do is create biographies of non-notable journalists from The Pearl Report. cab (call) 08:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
