Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Smyth (runner)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Smyth (runner)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable runner. No major achievements or medals won. Natg 19 (talk) 20:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and United States of America. Natg 19 (talk) 20:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:NTRACK - Top 8 finish at 2017 World Mountain Running Championships (and team bronze). Plus, along with what is in the article appears to meet WP:GNG with these: [1], [2], [3], [4]. RonSigPi (talk) 21:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We don't decide whether to keep an article based on achievements or medals won, we decide based on the presence or non-presence of coverage. And this athlete has enough specific coverage as demonstrated above. --Habst (talk) 14:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none of the sources provide Wikipedia:Significant coverage beyond saying he won X championship. बिनोद थारू (talk) 02:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 10:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The Runner's World and ESPN articles (a few comments above this one) are good sources, the interview can fill in the spaces but is primary sourcing. I think we have enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.