Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink (Victoria's Secret)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Victoria's Secret. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Pink (Victoria's Secret) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable sub-brand; completely without sources, evidence or assertion of notability. Orange Mike | Talk 20:41, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Victoria's Secret. If there's more content and info about this brand, then yeah, it can have a separate article. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Victoria's Secret, as the current article has not nearly enough context to show that the brand deserves its own article. No prejudice to recreation if the article can be expanded, well-sourced, and more information is given about the stand-alone stores. youngamerican (wtf?) 12:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
