Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premier Biosoft (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Premier Biosoft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. The article doesn't indicate any claim to notability. It reads like an advert. A WP:BEFORE search returns lots of press release material but no independent coverage. The article is supported by references that are either their own website, or in the first case, a broken link. Most of the external links are also broken. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:51, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 15:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 15:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, a run-of-the-mill software company. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP HighKing⁺⁺ 15:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom. No significant, independent coverage from reliable sources. Does not meet notability requirements. Just Artspam.Dlohcierekim's sock User talk:Dlohcierekim 04:58, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.