Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Camilla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Camilla

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary disambiguation. I don't see much of an indication that the Duchess of Cornwall is commonly referred to as "Queen Camilla", and the only place our article mentions that description is in the title of a Guardian article from 13 years ago. The disambiguation page should be deleted and Queen Camilla (book) moved back. Huon (talk) 00:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question. Where would Queen Camilla (book) go to - would it be merged with Sue Townsend? Vorbee (talk) 08:10, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and move the book back to the undisambiguated title (where it was from 2007 until a few hours ago), where the existing hatnote does all that is needed. All was well until recent page move. PamD 08:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per PamD. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral / Weakly support Keeping. (First off, just clarifying that we should absolutely move the book from the basename of "Queen Camilla" when Queen Elizabeth II dies.) However, for now, I'd personally argue that the situation should stay how it is now. I mean, more sources refer to Camilla possibly becoming "Queen Camilla" (a possible future title as queen consort) than people referencing the book at all. But, alas, the book is currently the only thing OFFICIALLY and CURRENTLY titled "Queen Camilla". However, although the book's page has a hatnote directing people to the person, I'm not sure if the BOOK is even the primary topic for this possible future term. ...But no matter if the book moves back to the basename, it DEFINITELY needs to be moved to "Queen Camilla (book)" when Elizabeth II dies (if she even dies before Cami at all, at this point...). Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and revert per PamD. WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL: Camilla might not become Queen, and if she does she might not use the title Queen Camilla. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We shouldn't have disambiguation pages for two pages anyway, particularly when one of the links isn't an article (yet). Celia Homeford (talk) 13:09, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.