Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/REICK (DJ)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

REICK (DJ)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity autobiography of a non-notable DJ. There is also a big conflict of interest, with the subject himself adding to his own autobiography. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 07:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC). Akhiljaxxn (talk) 08:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ~~~~ Its nice to meet you. I highly encourage your vigilance to make the experiance great for everyone. So here is my reply to clear your doubts. This page is not abouta singer, REICK is a DJ and an Electronic Music Producer who has collaborations internationally with artists having 3 grammy nominations for the same and REICK himself was in trending charts in countries like Mexico, Italy etc for his songs. The reason this page should exist is becausehis fans around the world wants it. ~~~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djkoushik (talk • contribs)

— Djkoushik (talk · contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page. There's an SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Djkoushik. Cabayi (talk) 12:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
— Djkoushik (talk • contribs) is blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate.

Delete - As noted by the nominator, the article was created by the DJ himself as Djkoushik, and he also supplied the Keep vote above (real name is Koushik Mukherjee). This DJ is completely in self-promotional mode right now. Under both his real name and "REICK" all that can be found are basic industry listings at sites where DJs sell their services, and various blurbs at unreliable promotional sites that allow artists to list themselves. He claims to have charted at Beatport but that site does not confirm the statement, and even so, Beatport is unreliable per WP:BADCHARTS. Delete per WP:PROMOTION. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete Doomsdayer520 covered most of the things I was going to say. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ~~~~ I am not sure about management correcting articles in considered legal in here or not. The details (some which I had also posted) can be vouched for / verified for as true with articles being provided on the same. This guy REICK's song has been placed on one of the biggest music tv channel around the world (info mentioned on page) and his songs has been trending on the biggest online streaming portal (info) on screen. -PartyShaker Entertainment— PartyShaker (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Djkoushik (talk • contribs).
Sock !vote struck. — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss - Hi so I'm the user djkoushik. I wouldnt discuss on keeping the page or not, i leave it on all it discuss / do it. I'd just like to clearr certain facts. The reason i responded in here firstly because the message was sent by the nominator himself Akhiljaxxn to respond to it.

Secondly yes we are a team in the company (hence a common username) for the artist and if management posting / confirming details in here violates the policy. I would ask the admins to take action for the following. Thank You -djkoushik — Preceding unsigned comment added by djkoushik (talk • contribs) — Djkoushik (talk • contribs) is blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate.

Delete. Zero notability, blatant self-promotion. Given what I'm seeing already, this AFD is going to turn into a sock farm quickly. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete G11 self promotion. Cabayi (talk) 12:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as article was created by a banned user, also self-promotion. Alexlatham96 (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - without prejudice; Blatant self-promotion, not enough coverage in independent sources to meet notability criteria. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 09:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:G11, violates WP:NOTPROMO and WP:AUTOBIO. Best, GPL93 (talk) 03:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.