Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rigby Raccon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 03:32, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rigby Raccon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable character, misspelled anyway. — Confession0791 ^talk 16:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Regular Show characters as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mordecai Blue jay. Would help to create a redirect under the correct name too. Ansh666 22:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I say delete completely. No known last name and "raccoon" misspelled. — Confession0791 ^talk 22:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

True, but given someone made the page, it could conceivably be a valid search term? Let's see what others say. Ansh666 23:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's no harm in keeping the redirect. Someone looking for "Ricky Raccon" will almost certainly be looking for the character anyway. Jafeluv (talk) 08:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and precedence. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 16:51, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, but create a new page with the correct spelling as a redirect to List of Regular Show characters. I don't see any reason why this character should have its own article, but I'm guessing that fans of the show will still search for it, so we should point them to the right place. --Jpcase (talk) 19:59, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I propose the redirect be Rigby raccoon per WP:TITLE, since he has no known last name. — Confession0791 ^talk 20:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I guess that would probably be a common search term, seeing as though the creator of this article decided to use it. I would suggest also doing one for Rigby (Regular Show). --Jpcase (talk) 20:39, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect already exists. [1] — Confession0791 ^talk 00:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. Then yeah, I would just say delete this page and create Rigby Raccoon as a redirect. --Jpcase (talk) 00:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to List of Regular Show characters. This lacks significant secondary source converage in independent sources. It doesn't have enough content to justify a standalone article. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:07, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no opinion on redirects. Rigby Raccon was split from List of Regular Show characters by User:Temastok (removal, cross-page diff). The split does not comply with WP:Splitting#How to properly split an article or WP:Copying within Wikipedia, and it must be repaired if not deleted. Since the text originates from the list (actually from Regular Show, prior to the split of the character list), there is nothing to merge back. Flatscan (talk) 04:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.