Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romaja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Romanization of Korean. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:09, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Romaja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A page simply for the Korean word for Roman alphabet. Such a page would be better off redirecting to Roman alphabet; its existence is redundant. Otherwise, we'd have pages for Luomazi (the Chinese word for "Roman alphabet"), Romanska alfabet, and Romanische alphabet, as well as all foreign-language translations for "Roman alphabet". The page was created by an IP editor when I was six (just kidding, not really), and has not changed much since. A redirect was contested in March 2004, with a pretty non-solid excuse. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 12:53, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ - fails at WP:NOT#DICT. Wiktionary might find a home for it, but it is not encyclopedic content.--Kudpung (talk) 14:30, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Romanization of Korean. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but it is a valid search term. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 14:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Romanization of Korean.--Shirt58 (talk) 09:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Romanization of Korean. `I've withdrawn my Delete vote (although the reason for it is still legitimate). I did not know about the existence of the Romanization of Korean page, and I think Shirt's suggestion is a feasible alternative.--Kudpung (talk) 13:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Completely agree with you: just as "Romaji" redirects to Romanization of Japanese, so "Romaja" should redirect to Romanization of Korean--Shirt58 (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.