Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald White (dog trainer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald White (dog trainer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a dog-trainer that fails to meet the notability requirements for inclusion. The subject appeared on a now defunct PBS show a few years ago but have no lasting notability. The article is now being used, likely by the subject, as an advertisement for his business including the posting of coupons (since removed). Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:39, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not meet WP:GNG. SagaciousPhil - Chat 04:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 13:00, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree with SagaciousPhil. I don't see WP:GNG getting passed here. NickCT (talk) 13:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Also agree with Sagaciousphil, as I see no evidence of notability; the article also seems a bit promotional even after Ponyo removed the link about coupons. Epicgenius (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Sagaciousphil. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 17:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.