Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Davidson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Davidson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local/regional political operative fails WP:NPOL. KidAd talk 00:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 September 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL, as noted by the nominator. Google, NYT, JSTOR, ProQuest and Gale did not find results to confirm WP:N. He's a local politician who hasn't recieved sufficient coverage to warrent an article. Z1720 (talk) 02:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Perennial local election loser, not a notable person. Reywas92^Talk 03:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Being local or regional chair of a political party's local or regional chapter is not an inherently notable role per WP:NPOL, and being an unsuccessful candidate for political office isn't notable either — to get an article for either of these reasons, he would have to show that he was significantly more notable, in some way that would pass the ten year test for enduring significance, than most other people who've done the same things. But this is referenced more than 50 per cent to unreliable and primary sources that are not support for notability, and the sources which are real media coverage are just the expected local media coverage that every local political figure can always show, which is not enough in and of itself to make him a special case. Bearcat (talk) 18:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable politician. LefcentrerightDiscuss 13:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete county party chairs are not notable for any party in the US, and state party chairs are not notable for minor parties in the US.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.