Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahil Seth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sahil Seth

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL. Nothing that is WP:SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and in depth. // Timothy :: talk 20:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 20:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 20:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We can't have articles on Indian civil servants who are in the news for that mere fact. The news about him being appointed as an advisor to a BRICS steering committee (non-notable and transient position) is trivial coverage. - hako9 (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No WP:SIGCOV. --Ab207 (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Routine news coverage for appointment to a non-notable position. Otherwise not covered in RS. Generally only senior bureaucrats having served at important posts are able to meet the notability criteria. Roller26 (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.