Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saurabh Gadgil (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saurabh Gadgil

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill businessman. Article was last deleted two years ago. References provided are either mentions-in-passing or rely almost exclusively on company produced material, press releases and/or quotations. Possible COI or paid editing. Edwardx (talk) 22:38, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article previously deleted through afd. I have also felt that this is the case of COI. And now talk about the references; All the references either Press Releases or announcements about the company. Subject does not meet Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines.DMySon (talk) 17:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article was created by User:AngryMushroom, and although they deny having any COI or being involved in paid editing, I have spent enough time at WP:COIN to be very scepitical of their denials. Methinks WP:DUCK applies. Edwardx (talk) 23:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability through WP:BASIC or WP:GNG. Agreed with COI concerns. Have draftified another of their article which is likely UPE. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of being notable. scope_creep^Talk 17:22, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.