Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shock Absorber (countermeasure)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The creation of a re-direct is an editorial one, and if someone wants to do that, go ahead. Aaron Brenneman (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Shock Absorber (countermeasure) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think it's notable. Marcus Qwertyus 05:53, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It would be better to have an article on this general kind of thing, rather than a specific brand. Wolfview (talk) 11:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/Improve: We have separate articles on the missiles, it would seem to me the countermeasures should get the same. Clearly notable. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: lack of notability established by independant and reliable sources. Heck, the article barely makes a description: so it's a jammer made for missiles. Why does this specific brand need an article independant of Infrared countermeasures and Anti-tank guided missile? bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Why do we have articles on BGM-71 TOW, instead of just using Anti-tank guided missile? Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Because TOWs are notable.Marcus Qwertyus 02:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Why do we have articles on BGM-71 TOW, instead of just using Anti-tank guided missile? Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/Redirect to Infrared countermeasures. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:24, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
