Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soa mc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Soa mc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are literally no sources for this. None, zero. Why? Because it's obviously made up by the author.

Made up probably, if phrases like "data codes" are any indication (the correct term is "data formats"), by someone who doesn't speak English very well. This doesn't give you any information which cannot be gleaned from existing articles like Service-oriented architecture, web service along with a lot of the other stuff in Category:Web services. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:42, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SOA-MC is a special denomination of SOA, placing emphasis on the existence of clients of different technologies, that is, multiple clients. There are many ways to use SOA. In many of them, the clients use one same technology. For example: the clients are web servers. When SOA is used knowingly for simultaneous use with clients of different technologies - e.g. computers and mobile devices - it is referred as SOA-MC.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbvb (talk • contribs) 19:09, 17 September 2012‎

The only person on the planet who uses "SOA-MC" to refer to anything computer-related is you. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not establish notability or significance in the article; if someone can come up with references which establish this as being important I would change my mind. I don't see any real significance here, just a really unclear way of explaining a server which implements a protocol and different clients implement the protocol. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 18:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I use the term "SOA-MC" to refer to my software projects (both Academically and for professional outsourcing activity). That term is simple and elegant to make it clear that it is expected that clients have different technologies. This article should remain in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcelols83 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC) — Marcelols83 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Just because you use the term does not mean that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Please see WP:ILIKEIT. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I'm finding no other uses of this term anywhere. This appears to be purely original research with no potential sources to verify. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The term "multiple clients" is used often to refer the same as in this article. See [[1]]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcelols83 (talk • contribs)

The phrases "service-oriented architecture" and "multiple clients" are very common and easy to verify. However, the combined phrase is the subject of the article and, thus, this deletion debate. As an aside, please sign your comments here by typing "~~~~" after them. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - "SOA MC" seems redundant, since SOAs support multiple clients types already. No reliable sources have been offered for the use of SOA MC as distinct from SOA. Maybe the article belongs on a web site somewhere, but not Wikipedia. MartinPoulter (talk) 22:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also have been unable to verify this phrase. Without verification, it obviously cannot stand.--Talain (talk) 22:41, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: article lacks sources to establish concept's notability, and I couldn't find anything elsewhere. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 12:22, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - SOA pretty much encompasses the concept of multiple clients. I don't see a distinct topic here. -- Whpq (talk) 22:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.