Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic Adventure (series)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 05:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sonic Adventure (series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
There are just two games with the word adventure in their titles, two games that neither Sega or Sonic Team have said form a series or sub-series in the Sonic the Hedgehog series of games. Also, due to the fact that neither Sega or Sonic Team have said that a Sonic Adventure series exists, the article is thus unsourcable. Michael Mad 20:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure I agree with you on this Afd. The article may be messy; but there's no need for it to be deleted. The fact that only two games were made is completely notable. There's nothing wrong with the fact that there are only two games of the series. I mean; look at "Runescape"; there's only one version of that; are you going to say that it's not highly detailed and creative? Look at some other games that only have one version. I don't believe they lack anything that multi-version games contain. Meldshal42 20:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 20:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - 100% redundant with Sonic Adventure and Sonic Adventure 2. Why double the maintenance? Needing overview pages such as this is really only necessary when dealing with a larger number of subjects. Wickethewok 21:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sonic Rush Adventure could be considered part of it, maybe. I feel neutral about this. Lrrr IV 22:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's completely pointless. RememberMe? 17:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.