Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophiya Anjam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AFD deletion discussions are determined by policy-based arguments, not on speculating on the motives of the nominator. Let me know if you would like to work on this article in Draft space so that it might one day be approved by AFC. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sophiya Anjam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable radio personality, does not meet the criteria of WP:BIO and WP:GNG, the references are primary and unreliable that are just interviews, and no other in-depth importance found in reliable, secondary and independent sources. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment All the articles that this User has put AFD tag on are Notable. of this User personal agenda based problem with Pakistani articles and other Which is its main problem article to be deleted. It has disturbed many articles and is disturbing many articles. And it mostly tries to for deletion as daily practice articles The same user made a name on a proper Wikipedia by creating 10-12 articles from his user page and after that he thought that no one can stop you to disturb me. it's ravaging at a very high rate. It has gone through many battles. with too many users this User should be banned asap. 11:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parkashjit Singh30 (talkcontribs) [reply]
  • Delete: NN bio. Fails all relevant notability tests. UtherSRG (talk) 19:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The references are notable and strong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmpwork (talkcontribs) 19:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist111 (talk) 06:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.