Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek: Chains of Betrayal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Star Trek fan productions. czar 05:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek: Chains of Betrayal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fan fiction film does not appear to meet WP:NFILM. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly falls short of guidelines on film notability Dexxtrall (talk) 13:36, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable fan film. The only review included as a link in the article is not from a reliable source, and searching for any actual coverage turns up nothing in acceptable sources. Rorshacma (talk) 18:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's some mild coverage of this out there and it was briefly noted in this PhD thesis. Not enough to where I'd say it should have its own article based on what I've found so far, but I do think that this could maybe merit a mention at Star Trek fan productions. It's not as heavy as some of the other fan films I've seen out there, coverage-wise, but it's still a teensy bit more than most offhand. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, two sources do not an article make. They look like good sources, though, so merge it to Star Trek fan productions. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. Not quite Axanar level. Artw (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge it to Star Trek fan productions as for single article there are no reliable sources. Rickshaw Takahashi (talk) 05:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.