Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Susco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Stephen Susco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - Definitely needs reliable sources and expansion but the article can possibly meet the notability criteria for WP:CREATIVE.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Loukinho (talk • contribs)
- Keep. Article is stubby, but he's the screenwriter for two major blockbusters and sources will be easy to find to confirm that. Meets criteria easily. - Mgm|(talk) 22:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - his films have made hundreds of millions of dollars. The second one made a considerable profit, even if it was a bit of a flop compared to the first one. What else does he need to do to achieve notability? - Richard Cavell (talk) 03:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. To quote WP:CREATIVE: The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - meets WP:CREATIVE as other editors have already pointed out, and there is coverage about him including this Variety interview. -- Whpq (talk) 15:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
