Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Sanders (journalist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Steve Sanders (journalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. The article has had zero third-party sources that establish any notability for over two years, and searching online has yielded none either. The article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. The Chicago Tribune source does not appear to be an independent source, since the piece's author is listed as "WGN News", and the article's copyright notice is listed as "Copyright © 2012, WGN-TV, Chicago". - SudoGhost 05:25, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If the content can be sourced, it probably passes WP:N. Also the Trib source contains a lot of personal biography content that should be added to the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:27, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:20, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:20, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Even if sources can be found, I don't think this meets the threshold notability guidelines for people. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 17:07, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If there are sources, it passes by WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:12, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. --Shorthate (talk) 23:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
