Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Shah Khusro Hussaini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 19:48, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Shah Khusro Hussaini

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable educationist, fails WP:BIO. WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 19:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 19:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 19:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the equivalent of a university president and the recipient of two honorary doctorates. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There may be other grounds for keeping this, but I must point out that one of the honorary degrees is from Belford University, an unaccredited diploma mill. Phil Bridger (talk) 07:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete he is the president of a University founded in 2018 which is clearly not in the spirit of WP:NPROF: "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.", I dont see this University as a "major academic institution". His awards including honorary degrees are from non-notable institutions with little academic credibility. He also fails all other points of WP:NPROF and fails WP:GNG. --hroest 18:52, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per hroest. Sometimes, a case for passing WP:PROF falls apart when examined: "awards" turn out to be not so meritorious, etc. XOR'easter (talk) 17:43, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.