Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Indiana Jones Interrogations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus is clear DGG ( talk ) 04:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Indiana Jones Interrogations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Youtube based series sourced to a couple blogs. Can't see any claim of significance here. Legacypac (talk) 11:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete. Upon a quick search on YouTube, the series hardly has a significant number of views to meet Wikipedia:Notability (web). GabeIglesia (talk) 14:05, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Web-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At this time this is just WP:SELFPROMOTION created by an SPA. It might help if any of the names mentioned had their own article. It does not meet WP:GNG. If, in the future, it does gain mentions in WP:SECONDARY sources then it can be recreated. MarnetteD|Talk 19:49, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone, I'm the maker of the article. I suppose it didn't strike me as that harmful to make an article for the series, given it is something that's existence can be backed up and it is steadily becoming more popular. I mean, any media project starts out without much 'claim to significance', right? Of course, if the mods deem it not worth keeping up, I can't stop them. But that's where I was coming from with it. Jones6192 —Preceding undated comment added 23:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. See, the problem is, Wikipedia has some very specific WP:Notability requirements, and simply existing is often not enough. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – As the article's author noted, "any media project starts out without much 'claim to significance'". Given the project's current stage of development, it definitely is not sufficiently notable to warrant a Wikipedia article. If Jones6192 is indeed the web series's creator, I wish you all the best with the future of the project. Graham (talk) 02:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. Thanks for responding respectfully to me about this, and clarifying how the rules work. If it's to be deleted, I won't put up a fight. And thanks, Graham, for the support. Cheers, everybody! Jones6192 —Preceding undated comment added 15:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.