Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stables

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Does not appear to be notable and reliable sources to verify some sort of notability cannot be located. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Stables

Contested PROD, about a small non-notable bar/ music venue in Dublin. No sources beyond an official website, (fails WP:V) a Google News search turns up with nothing non-trivial, failing WP:N. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 05:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-Notable.--RyRy5 ^{Got something to say?} 08:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very week keep Seems like a lot of notable artists have performed there, a Google archive news search shows up a few mentions, but no articles about the actual bar and you are right to label the mentions trivial. This article, though, I think is a borderline notability thing, and in this case, I'll put on my inclusionist hat and say, why the hell not? The Dominator^Talk_Edits 13:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not inhereted. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 21:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please point me to that exact policy? I can't seem to find it, thanks. I am willing to discuss this article, after all this is a debate rather than a vote and my opinion can be swayed. The Dominator^Talk_Edits 23:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an official policy per se, but its part of a list of precedents that surround AfD discussions that are typically accepted by contributors, WP:ITSA.... the idea that notability should be established separately. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 02:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see, but I am allowed to disagree with it, in this case, notability is not inherited certainly does apply here, but to me the notable people at least indicate that the bar exists and isn't just some small bar that nobody's ever heard of, so to me, it doesn't establish notability by itself, but it is an indicator that the bar might be notable. The Dominator^Talk_Edits 02:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 14:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable, no reliable sources for the claims. The besst I could come up with were MySpace pages. Huon (talk) 15:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable source coverage to be seen; fails WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:00, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable --Pustefix (talk) 18:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.