Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Jackson (politician) (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Jackson (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a city councillor in a city not large enough to confer notability on its city councillors under WP:POLITICIAN. Article's only "sources" are his own profile on the city's website (i.e. a primary source) and a table of the results from an election he ran in (i.e. a trivial source), and thus the article makes no credible or sourced claim that he's more notable than most other city councillors. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 20:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.