Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tor-Kristian Karlsen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. There do seem to be sources added that indicate GNG but editors dont currently support these as meeting GNG. This seems likely a result that they are not linked to online sources and are not referencing specific sections of the article. Personally I feel that this article could be recovered if written in more detail with the sources presented backing up more concrete statements. Fenix down (talk) 11:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tor-Kristian Karlsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable football related person who fails NFOOTY and GNG. Some references provided, but SIGCOV is not reached, IMO. BlameRuiner (talk) 09:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:17, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:17, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Lame of you to totally disregard the sources in the article. Geschichte (talk) 10:44, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Nahal(T) 21:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Non-argument. Geschichte (talk) 11:06, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.