Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ujawal Jha (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ujawal Jha

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely UPE, contested draftification so we're here with factors not appreciably changing since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ujawal Jha. Suggest SALT since the SPI wasn't conclusive. Star Mississippi 17:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nepal. Star Mississippi 17:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- The way he has been covered in most sources isn't considered reliable. It's most likely paid PR! Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 17:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete same concerns as last time, no coverage at home, only covered in Nigerian sources? The iffy quality of these sources with no by-lines or the usual paid promo we see there is enough to make this non-notable. Oaktree b (talk) 18:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zero coverage in Nepal, limiting it to .np sources [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: it seems to be drafted at Draft:Ujawal Jha. – 64andtim ^(talk) 00:40, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. It was a poor choice to draftify in the first place. Because this is what happens. AFD is on and the article is gone; AFD will close and the article will be back. Draftification should only be done if there is consensus that draftification will help. No amount of editing can make a non-notable topic notable. Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I became aware of this person from the repeated recreation of items on them in Wikidata. Before requesting deletion of the Wikidata items, I did a search of the person's biography and sources and could not identify more than one article that wasn't sponsored content or other paid promotion. Considering that Wikidata has a much lower bar for notability, that should say something. Also I wonder if the creator of this article is doing undisclosed paid editing. -- William Graham ^talk 19:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.