Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up to Our Necks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The target page (a redirect, at the time the AfD was created) was deleted as {{db-move}}. I believe this AfD was created by mistake. Reh man 03:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Up to Our Necks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no context Lemonpasta (talk) 22:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As the original requester, I'm not sure what you mean by "no context". I asked for this redirect to be deleted so that the actual article (Up to our Necks) could be moved to its proper capitalization, per the db-move template. Is there some reason this needs discussion? -Dewelar (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The contested page is a redirect. It can and should be improved. The reason provided in the nomination is unclear. What "context" do we expect from a redirect? -The Gnome (talk) 07:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.