Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Víctimas del Pecado

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Víctimas del Pecado

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much of the information on this movie has been directly copied from reviews. The article is bias and is not notable, and is unsupported by third-party sources. Aeroplanepics0112 (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

French:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

German:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Greek:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Finland:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Belgion:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Italy:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep Meets WP:NF. Rewrite plot section, and expand through available sources.[1] This film was nominated for 2 Mexican Academy of Film Ariel Awards in 1952. More, the film had wide international distribution under different titles,[2] and has screened at retrospectives more than five years after initial release.[3][4][5][6] We do not delete notable topics simply because the article suffers from addressable issues. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Since nomination, the plot section has been improved, a few sources have been added, and the reception section has been tagged for additional cleanup and sourcing. It would be helpful if editors able to read Spanish add sources. Will need input from the Spanish cinema task force. Per WP:NRVE, see Google scholar and Google book results. Simply being unknown here, does not make a topic somehow unnotable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per oscar nominations. LenaLeonard (talk) 04:26, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable, per our notability standards.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MichaelQSchmidt. Notable under many points of view. Cavarrone (talk) 08:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.