Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valérie Dupont

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:43, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valérie Dupont

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't seem to pass GNG NAH 13:34, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: An article on Valérie Dupont was deleted from the French Wikipedia in 2010. AllyD (talk) 18:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The information on the page is insufficient for the WP:POLITICIAN criteria. I note some passing coverage of the subject's 2010 resignation from the FN ([1]) but that is no better for establishing the subject's notability. AllyD (talk) 08:32, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:45, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per the discussion. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 18:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one. But this makes no other claim that she has any preexisting notability for other reasons besides the candidacy, and is referenced solely to her own party's self-published list of its own candidates rather than any evidence that she has received enough reliable source coverage to claim a WP:GNG pass. Bearcat (talk) 16:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we have deleted articles about losing candidates. I don't see consensus changing anytime soon. Bearian (talk) 15:56, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only elected officials are default notable, candidates are not. We used to accept certain candidates as default notable, but we realized at some point that this just created article clutter with lots of articles that were basically campaign brochures.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:56, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.