Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vertical City, New Town

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to FinTech Hub, Kolkata. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vertical City, New Town

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Planned tower fails WP:NBUILD Dewritech (talk) 19:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Companies, and West Bengal. Skynxnex (talk) 21:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: TOOSOON, but it's possible that this will be notable. The coverage provided isn't quite SIGCOV but this might be an important structure when its built. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Standard office building built on spec in a city also being built on spec; it's a PROMO. Nate • (chatter) 00:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voorts, you have a good idea. Note though, that a draft will get deleted in 6 months if it's in draft space. This building may not have even started then. An alternative would be for some editor to step forward and ask that the article be moved to a subpage of their own user page where there is no expiration date.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 00:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. What about merging the content to a new section for Planned Developments in the FinTech Hub, Kolkata article? Rupples (talk) 03:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting after Merge proposal mentioned.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like the merge proposal. With something like this, moving to draft is just 6-month delayed deletion. Better to keep the history in mainspace, so that it can easily be reconstructed if/when it is finished and discussed in reliable indept sources. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: target seems reasonable to me – while not appearing notable on its own (yet), it seems due for inclusion in the article on the district when so much is still under development there. Tollens (talk) 23:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.