Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WinZO (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WinZO

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Renominating this since it was restored considering there was not enough participation at last AFD and was closed as soft delete. Same rational, no WP:CORPDEPTH. Seems to written to promote the company. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:44, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also, does WP:REFUND not have any consideration to deny for a clear COI editor? The editor in question works for the company. At least 3 others are in the edit history, one of which was already indefinite blocked and the other had the company name in their name. -- ferret (talk) 23:00, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Disclosure: I've indefinitely pblocked the editor who requested refund from the article. -- ferret (talk) 23:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ferret. There are so many such restorations. I have to keep going back to my logs to see if something I PROD'd was brought back. I think when restoring, there should be a discussion on notability. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:12, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
comment it can be keep on WP because of Awards, however, sources are not good!. ZEP55 (talk) 17:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:CORPDEPTH and the example list of trivial coverage, including brief/passing mentions for non-notable awards. These are all non-notable awards. -- ferret (talk) 17:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per nom. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Clearly fails WP:NCORP. Gentleman wiki (talk) 19:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.