Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizard of Odd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wizard of Odd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only two sources, little relevant production, and no reception. Mouseinphilly (talk) 15:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I admit that finding reviews proved to be very difficult, but it won an Emmy. It's difficult to get more notable than that. There are dozens are articles covering that. I guess you could just put the Emmy award in the main article (or the animators', if they have articles). So, maybe I'd support a merge, too. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Here be the Emmy reference. [[1]]. scope_creep talk 20:14 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Redirect to Phineas and Ferb (season 2)#ep103. It's all plot and has (very, very) little prod. info. Mediran (t • c) 03:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I did find one review for the episode and my first instinct is to say "redirect" but this specific episode did get two of its artists an Emmy. Technically it does pass notability guidelines. I won't argue too hard against a consensus to redirect, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:36, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.