Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeji (singer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. I see a rough consensus that this article should be moved to Draft space. Editors interested in working on improving it can find it there. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeji (singer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant individual notability as a singer or actress outside of her group - suggest redirect per WP:BANDMEMBER Evaders99 (talk) 06:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Evaders99 (talk) 06:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Dance, and South Korea. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, there seems to be significant coverage for individual notability here. Coalah (talk) 16:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where Coalah? Care to link the sources? dxneo (talk) 11:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the sources already present in the article, if those aren't considered significant coverage by most editors then I see the case for deleting. Coalah (talk) 11:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coalah, remember it was AfD'd with those sources present. The English sources cover the ensemble other than that one of "The Universe". Subject fails WP:MUSICBIO and does not seem to pass notability outside the works of their ensemble. Since I cannot review the non-English (green) sources, I am leaning towards delete. dxneo (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I believe its better to move the article into a draft instead of deleting it. Lililolol (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lililolol, you do realise that you voted "keep" although your statement supports "draftify/userfy" right? dxneo (talk) 16:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I moved the article back into mainspace because according to WP:ATD-I the article should not have been draftified. Lightoil (talk) 17:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. She simply doesn't meet WP:SINGER/WP:BANDMEMBER at this point of time with no SIGCOV for individual activities other than passing mentions from Itzy's related activities. I'm not going to debate why the AfC was even accepted given that the acceptor was CU blocked however I'm happy to support dratification (or re-dratify ... the bold dratify looks fine to me) with its history moved along to draftspace. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify: The article needs more improvements which can be done by moving it to a draft K-Pop contributor (✍️•📚) 13:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sourcing seems more than adequate; most are in RS (green per source tool) and I've used most of them writing other Korean bios for Wiki Loves Asia myself. Oaktree b (talk) 15:16, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.