Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuki Miura

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 04:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yuki Miura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 02:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of those things actually meets NHOCKEY or GNG. Joeykai (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically, from WP: NHOCKEY, "Played on a senior national team for the World Championship, in the highest pool the IIHF maintained in any given year (Note: playing in lower pools that do not actually contest for the World Champion title is not enough to satisfy inclusion requirements)." Joeykai (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. AaronWikia (talk) 02:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. AaronWikia (talk) 02:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AaronWikia (talk) 02:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Like 18abruce, I am at a loss to figure how he or Wayne Simpson figures into this AfD of an unrelated NN amateur hockey player, and suggest that AaronWikia has been involved in too many hockey-related deletion discussions and article creations to still have no idea what the provisions of WP:NHOCKEY are. Ravenswing 04:09, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ravenswing: Do you think I am an "editor with a history of dubious hockey-related article creations" is offensive? – AaronWikia (talk) 05:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your sentence makes no sense. And that quote which I assume is from someone is pretty accurate, you have a very dubious history of article creations when it comes to hockey. -DJSasso (talk) 10:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.