Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 May 25

May 25

File:Mrwhosetheboss YouTube icon.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's rather gray for this logo. It both fails and passes NFCC1 depending on how you look at it. This logo is an image of a living person, so theoretically, the image can be replaced with a free equivalent. Any comments for this? --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 02:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image has an incorrect tag. While tag as copyrighted, this image isn't a logo, it is a photograph of a living person, Arun Rupesh Maini. Delete it, non-free media depicting a living person constitutes violation of WP:NFCC#1, because it always replaceable with other images depicting him. Kys5g^talk! 03:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kys5g, Please remember to bold your votes. — thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then strong delete. Though there isn't any free images exist, it still violates the policy, and considered violating WP:NFC#UUI, point 1.

WP:FREER also stated that: If the answer to either is yes (A: Can be replaced by a free content and B: Would serve the same functions like non-free ones), the non-free content probably does not meet this criterion (WP:NFCC#1). Note that the replacement image does not need to exist; it is sufficient that it could be created – for example, in most cases, a photograph of a living person can be taken and released under a free license. Kys5g^talk! 15:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: No reasonable alternative. — thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Subject is still alive and in the public eye. Textbook WP:NFCC#1 violation -Fastily 08:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ChrisMD YouTube Icon.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's rather gray for this logo. It both fails and passes NFCC1 depending on how you look at it. This logo is an image of a living person, so theoretically, the image can be replaced with a free equivalent. Any comments for this? --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 02:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image has an incorrect tag. While tag as copyrighted, this image isn't a logo, it is a photograph of a living person, Christopher Michael Dixon. Delete it, non-free media depicting a living person constitutes violation of WP:NFCC#1, because it always replaceable with other images depicting him. Kys5g^talk! 03:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:H 4 ill 639759 cambodia-phnom penh-1979-61.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved, a license tag was added by User:185.172.241.184 -Fastily 08:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file has a non-free rationale, but it does not have a license tag indicating its license. Kys5g^talk! 10:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seal of the Bangladesh Air Force (BAF).svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status (with no consensus), defaulting to status quo (non-free). -Fastily 08:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per source, this file is from Bangladesh Air Force's website. Such media from this website is / are licensed freely under CC BY-SA 4.0. Kys5g^talk! 13:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kys5g That means it can be uploaded in Commons. Then it is not non-free. Mehedi Abedin 07:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also thought about relicensing it without discussion, but I think the uploader may decline it, or it is only allowed in some circumstances. Relicensing the image should have a discussion, either in the file talk or this (FfD). Moreover, this file lacks many older revisions, and I don't want to disturb the admins and bot operators to get a consent restoring them, but I'll talk to one of the revision removers. Kys5g^talk! 11:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:: I'm unable to access www.baf.mil.bd since the link times out when I click on it; however, I did find this August 2023 archived version of the site, and there's nothing that can find on that version which states its content has been released under a CC by-sa 4.0 license; in fact, if you scroll all the way down to the bottom of the site, it actually states "© 2022 Bangladesh Air Force. All Rights Reserved". Perhaps the license was changed, but linking to a Creative Commons website about CC BY-SA 4.0 is not really helpful, but linking to an actual licensing statement on the Bangladesh Air Force's website would make licensing verification much easier. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons: Just because it is free does not warrant an FFD to move to commons. I think this FFD is a waste of time. If the OP wishes, I can move the logo to Commons, just ping me. — thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Marchjuly, same happened to me. Little suspicious. *insert thinking emoji here* — thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The file shouldn't be moved to Commons unless the CC license can be verified because it's likely going to end up tagged for speedy deletion or being discussed at c:COM:DR if it is. Moreover, it's going to be assumed that the person moving the file has indeed verified said license and can demonstrate the file is licensed as such per c:COM:EVID. The file's current licensing may be incorrect, but the file isn't really in danger of being deleted due to it being used as non-free content. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sketch (streamer) icon.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a logo. This is a photograph of a Sketch that he uses as his YouTube image, similar to a profile picture. We certainly do not allow, say, Facebook profile pictures to be used in this manner, so this is no different. Fails WP:NFCC#1. – Pbrks ^(t·c) 15:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No clear reason why the subject's YouTube logo would be any better for identification than any non-copyrighted photo of him.--Martin IIIa (talk) 12:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.