Wikipedia:Peer review/New York City/archive1
Appearance
This article was nominated for FA status a year ago and failed. The main objection was that it was not comprehensive enough. Secondary objections were about POV and poor writing. Since then this article has seen major rewriting and additions. If anything the article is now too comprehensive at 60+ kbs. POV and poor writing issues have been corrected. Before renomination for FA status we need to edit for concision, to 50 kbs. Wv235 17:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Transportation/Airports makes no mention of the general aviation, and as such is pro-airline-POV. IMHO, the main article cited in the section could do better mentioning reliever GA airports as well. --BACbKA 00:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- It's long and could use some trimming. More cited references might be nice, maybe one or two per section if necessary. Also, review the issues revolving around the plans to rebuild at the WTC as I think the Freedom Tower may be on hold. To trim, focus on city history more and trim areas like climate, etc.--MONGO 04:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)